Shane Elen
Fig. 335nm |
Fig. 340nm (extremely weak) |
Fig. 345nm |
Fig. 350nm |
Fig. 355nm |
Fig. h335nm |
Fig. h340nm |
Fig. h345nm |
Fig. h350nm |
Fig. h355nm |
Fig. 360nm |
Fig. 365nm |
Fig. 370nm |
Fig. 375nm |
Fig. 380nm |
Fig. h360nm |
Fig. h365nm |
Fig. h370nm |
Fig. h375nm |
Fig. h380nm |
Fig. 385nm |
Fig. 390nm |
Fig. 395nm |
Fig. 400nm |
Fig. 405nm |
Fig. h385nm |
Fig. h390nm |
Fig. h395nm |
Fig. h400nm |
Fig. h405nm |
Fig. u320nm |
Fig. u325nm |
Fig. u330nm |
Fig. u335nm |
Fig. u340nm |
Fig. hu320nm |
Fig. hu325nm |
Fig. hu330nm |
Fig. hu335nm |
Fig. hu340nm |
It was observed from the histograms of these images that the blue channel was dominant for ultraviolet light between 395nm and 400nm, whereas the red channel became dominant for 390nm and below. In general the green channel was the weakest channel however between 380nm and 370nm it contained enough signal to be useful. Useful for what? In situations where infrared is contaminating the ultraviolet image it might be possible (Nikon D70) to exclude the red channel and improve the ultraviolet contrast by using either the blue and/or green channel data only. Of course this will only work if the sample actually reflects ultraviolet in this range, otherwise the channel will have no data in it - check the histogram. For more information on dealing with infrared contamination go here
The following image was captured using an ultraviolet-free infrared flash and the histogram exhibits the distribution of infrared throughout the blue, green and red channels. The infrared data is concentrated primarily in the red channel, however some also occurs in the green channel and the least amount occurs in the blue channel. By comparing the ultraviolet and infrared histograms it is evident that some overlap can exist when both forms of light are present. This illustrates why infrared contamination of an ultraviolet image can be a problem. More detailed infrared distribution into the RGB channels can be found below.
Fig.16. Histogram for the infrared dandylion image in fig. 17 |
Fig.17. Infrared dandylion image |
Fig. 700nm |
Fig. 725nm |
Fig. 750nm |
Fig. 775nm |
Fig. h700nm |
Fig. h725nm |
Fig. h750nm |
Fig. h775nm |
Fig. 780nm |
Fig. 785nm |
Fig. 790nm |
Fig. 795nm |
Fig. 800nm |
Fig. h780nm |
Fig. h785nm |
Fig. h790nm |
Fig. h795nm |
Fig. h800nm |
Fig. 805nm |
Fig. 810nm |
Fig. 815nm |
Fig. 820nm |
Fig. 825nm |
Fig. h805nm |
Fig. h810nm |
Fig. h815nm |
Fig. h820nm |
Fig. h825nm |
Fig. 850nm |
Fig. 875nm |
Fig. 900nm |
Fig. 925nm |
Fig. 950nm |
Fig. h850nm |
Fig. h875nm |
Fig. h900nm |
Fig. h925nm |
Fig. h950nm |
© Shane Elen 2006. Last updated April 7th, 2007.